Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Review: Robin Hood (1938)


This retelling of the classic story is one that is both fun to watch, and incredibly well designed.

Many movies from this era tended towards the campy. Special Effects were not really given the same importance that they are today, and often, these movies come off as painfully dated. This movie avoids that, and manages to put together a package that is as enjoyable as any out today.

Errol Flynn plays Robin, and he pulls of the role masterfully. He is cocky, sure, funny and irrepressible. He does the perfect job portraying a bandit who is only acting in the interests of his country. His offhanded remarks carry just the right undertone of threat and insult to them that makes his already witty banter all that much more fun to watch.

I am not going to comment much on the rest of the cast specifically. They all performed their roles beautifully, but I didn't feel were anything truly remarkable. They were all fun characters to watch, fulfilling their responsibility to the storyline admirably.

But where this movie really shined for me was in the visually effects. The movie made use of all eleven Technicolor cameras in existence at the time. For a movie so early on in color, this had all the clarity of any movie today, allowing for bright colors, and a vibrant look that hasn't dimmed over time. The backdrop featured footage that was correctly out of focus, drawing attention away from itself, and maintaining a look of being outside without actually being so.

Another point of interest was that the stuntmen were shot with real arrows (they were carefully padded of course) by the production's archery master (who also plays Robin's opponent in the tournament.) This man also fired Robin's arrow which split his opponent's down the middle, winning him the tournament. This was done in one take, with no camera tricks. Skills.... You're doing it right.

If I had to find one problem with the movie, it would be the lighting. The lighting often felt overly bright, as if everything was taking place at high-noon during the summer. But this was something that didn't really click with me until after viewing, so it really does nothing to downplay the movie.

Truly a masterpiece, and it's very clear why Disney in 1973 and Mel Brooks in 1993 drew so heavily on this movie for their inspiration (Mel Brooks so much so that during the scene where Robin meets John Little that my husband and I were cracking up at the memory of the Mel Brooks scene more so than the already funny 1938 scene).

If you enjoy the story of Robin Hood, this is a must-see. It's enjoyable, funny, and incredibly well crafted.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Enter your comments below. Comments are moderated, so expect up to 24 hours before they appear.